skip navigation
« Back to previous page

The FEC is currently redesigning its website. This page hasn't been redesigned yet, but it still contains the most up-to-date information.

yHOME / LAW & REGS / LITIGATION / ONGOING / LIEU v. FEC

Ongoing Litigation

Lieu, et al. v. FEC

 

Litigation Home Ongoing Litigation Selected Cases Alphabetical Case Index



Lieu, et al. v. FEC
Case Summary

 

On February 28, 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a suit brought against the Commission by Representative Ted Lieu, Representative Walter Jones, Senator Jeff Merkley, State Senator John Howe, Zephyr Teachout, and Michael Wager (“Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs alleged that the Commission had relied on an “unlawful ruling” in SpeechNow.org v. FEC to dismiss a complaint against several Super PACs.

Plaintiffs' administrative complaint had alleged that those Super PACs had knowingly accepted contributions in excess of the limits set by the Federal Election Campaign Act. The Commission dismissed the administrative complaint, citing SpeechNow.org v. FEC. Upon dismissal of the administrative complaint, Plaintiffs asked the court to declare the Commission’s actions “contrary to law.” The court noted that the Plaintiffs' allegations “fall squarely within the holding of SpeechNow,” and concluded that the Commission’s dismissal of Plaintiffs' administrative complaint was not contrary to law because the Commission properly applied the D.C. Circuit’s en banc ruling in that case.

Source:   FEC Record -- March 2019; December 2016.


Court Decisions and Related Documents


Appeals Court (DC Circuit)

Court Decisions :
Related Documents :

 


District Court (DC)

Court Decisions :
Related Documents :

(Top of Page)